EndsandMeans
MenuCases

CASE / 2016–2016

Koto Tinggi nagari governance documented in 2016

A bounded 2016 study of formal institutions and development-planning practice in Koto Tinggi.

DETAILS

What are the case boundaries and records?

Check the scope, related ideas, and institutional evidence behind the overview.

Scope, selection, freshness, and background links
Boundary: Nagari government, representative and customary councils, and development planning documented for Koto Tinggi in 2016; the study’s fieldwork occurred in October, while the cited budget meeting is dated only to 2016. Decentralization from 2001 is background, and the cited formal design dates to Agam Regulation 12 of 2007.
Why this case: Selected to separate maternal-line social organization from the public offices, representative bodies, customary council, and rules-in-use of one named nagari.
Koto Tinggi governance documented in 2016 2016–2016

The institutions and development-planning interactions described for Koto Tinggi in 2016, not all Agam or Minangkabau nagari; October dates the fieldwork, not every reported interaction.

Formal design

observation

Under Agam Regulation 12 of 2007, Koto Tinggi’s nagari structure included an elected wali nagari and executive staff.

observation

Under Agam Regulation 12 of 2007, Koto Tinggi’s nagari structure included a representative Nagari Council.

observation

Under Agam Regulation 12 of 2007, Koto Tinggi’s nagari structure included a Kerapatan Adat Nagari customary council drawn from kin groups.

observation

Nurdin reports that the Nagari Council convened development meetings whose invited delegates included representatives of women’s groups.

Claim reviewed
  1. Ismail Nurdin, 2017p. 109, ‘The Mechanism of Rural Development’, paragraph beginning ‘According to the Regulation of Ministry of Village’ · supports

observation

The formal meeting procedure required a two-thirds quorum.

observation

The formal meeting procedure allowed participants to express their views before a decision.

Claim reviewed
  1. Ismail Nurdin, 2017p. 110, first paragraph, sentence beginning ‘All participants’ · supports

observation

The formal meeting procedure preferred consensus.

Claim reviewed
  1. Ismail Nurdin, 2017p. 110, first paragraph, sentence beginning ‘Decision making’ · supports

observation

The formal meeting procedure permitted majority voting if consensus failed.

Rules in use

observation

In 2016 the wali nagari delivered a draft budget too late for council review.

observation

Council members secured a one-week postponement of the 2016 budget meeting.

observation

The reconvened 2016 meeting reached consensus on allocations for infrastructure, housing repairs, and scholarships.

Interactions

observation

The Koto Tinggi customary-council head and another adat leader told Nurdin that the representative council displaced the customary council from legislative work.

Claim reviewed
  1. Ismail Nurdin, 2017p. 110, final two paragraphs before ‘Dynamic of Interaction in Rural Development’ · supports

Observed outcomes

observation

Nurdin reports incomplete planning documents in Koto Tinggi.

Claim reviewed
  1. Ismail Nurdin, 2017p. 110, paragraph beginning ‘Looking at the stipulated mechanism’ · supports

observation

Nurdin reports unspent program funds in Koto Tinggi.

Claim reviewed
  1. Ismail Nurdin, 2017p. 110, paragraph beginning ‘Looking at the stipulated mechanism’ · supports

observation

Nurdin reports difficulty meeting accounting requirements in Koto Tinggi.

Claim reviewed
  1. Ismail Nurdin, 2017p. 110, paragraph beginning ‘Looking at the stipulated mechanism’ · supports

observation

Council members told Nurdin that nagari personnel had not been adequately prepared for changing regulations.