APPROACH
Linz's regime analysis
Linz's regime analysis is a scholarly comparison of ideal types, not a political movement, a regime's self-description, or an automatic label for a country.
Sources for this overview 2 claims
definition
Linz's ideal type distinguishes authoritarian regimes by limited, non-responsible pluralism, weak or absent guiding ideology, restricted mobilization, and formally unclear but generally predictable limits on leadership.
definition
Linz's totalitarian ideal type combines a monistic power center, an exclusive guiding ideology, and extensive political mobilization.
Overview
What should you know?
How does the totalitarian ideal type differ?
For the contrasting type, Linz asks whether rule converges around one political center, demands fidelity to an encompassing doctrine, and organizes participation from above. Historical cases can fit either type incompletely, so the categories do not transfer all properties to every classified regime.
Sources for “How does the totalitarian ideal type differ?” 2 claims
definition
Linz's totalitarian ideal type combines a monistic power center, an exclusive guiding ideology, and extensive political mobilization.
definition
In Linz's analysis, limited pluralism and constrained mobilization distinguish authoritarian regimes from the monistic power center, guiding ideology, and extensive mobilization associated with totalitarian regimes.
REFERENCE
Inspect the model
Open the formal relationships and evidence behind the summary.