SOURCE / article
Tribal agency and the translocalization of the Middle East: the European mandates, the Arab Bedouins and the making of the post-Ottoman order
About this source
The publisher-hosted Historical Research article based on French and British archives, Arabic newspapers, and other primary records.
CLAIM CONNECTIONS / 9
Where this source is used
Çiçek argues at the regional Bedouin level that a shaykh risked internal crisis if he disregarded fellow tribespeople’s interests and therefore had to persuade them when government demands conflicted with those interests.
- supports · pp. 603–604
Çiçek places the Ruwalla among mobile groups linked through the ʿAnaza genealogy, which actors could mobilize for political alliance; the affiliation did not erase differences among Ruwalla sections or create a single centralized ʿAnaza state.
- supports · pp. 602–603 and 607–608
The principal historical studies reconstruct Ruwalla action by cross-reading French and British colonial archives with Arabic newspapers and multilingual private papers, travel accounts, and tribal reference works.
- supports · p. 601, introduction and source note
Because the reviewed source base centers official archives and political intermediaries, it does not yet establish how Ruwalla women and non-elite pastoralists described the same decisions.
- context · p. 601, introduction and source note
In the 1920s Nuri al-Shaʿlan used control of and access to al-Jawf to negotiate with British and French authorities, Amir Abdullah, King Faisal, and Ibn Saud over winter pasture, mobility, and regional influence.
- supports · pp. 607–609, section ‘Bedouins, Wahhabism and borders’
Çiçek finds that mandate and regional governments could not reduce mobile tribal affiliation to ordinary individual nationality and instead developed exemptions and interstate mechanisms that preserved cross-border migration.
- supports · pp. 602–605 and 613–614
Ruwalla organization between 1918 and 1936 joined mobile pastoral production, layered kin affiliation, shaykhly representation, and bargaining with rival states under conditions specific to the post-Ottoman border settlement; it is not a stage or template for Arabian, Bedouin, tribal, or confederated government.
- context · pp. 601–614
Ruwalla cross-border shaykhly representation during a post-imperial border settlement and Jinst household pasture coordination after collective dissolution involved different actors, scales, institutions, evidence traditions, and state relationships; shared mobility vocabulary does not make them instances of one evolutionary or political type.
- context · pp. 601–614
During the post-Ottoman settlement, Ruwalla seasonal movement connected the southwestern Syrian Desert with pasture and water around Wadi Sirhan and al-Jawf across territories claimed by Syria, Transjordan, Iraq, and Ibn Saud.
- supports · pp. 602–603 and 607–609