SOURCE / article
The Rehn–Meidner Model in Sweden: Its Rise, Challenges and Survival
About this source
The peer-reviewed Journal of Economic Issues article consulted for the model's objectives, mechanisms, institutional context, and application boundaries.
CLAIM CONNECTIONS / 10
Where this source is used
The model paired selective employment support with mobility-enhancing adjustment measures intended to sustain employment and move labor toward expanding activities.
- supports · pp. 680–683
From 1956 to 1983, Swedish solidaristic wage policy operated through coordinated peak bargaining with industry and workplace implementation rather than through one uniform wage fixed centrally.
- supports · pp. 681–684
Rehn and Meidner advocated combining full employment and fair wages with price stability and high economic growth.
- supports · pp. 677–681
Sweden never consistently applied the full Rehn–Meidner package, although the late 1950s to early 1970s combined an expansion of active labor-market policy and solidaristic wage policy during the model's strongest period of influence.
- supports · pp. 683–684 and 704–705
The Rehn–Meidner model combined solidaristic wage policy and active labor-market policy with restrictive macroeconomic policy over the business cycle.
- supports · pp. 677–682
The model called for restrictive general fiscal policy over the business cycle to restrain inflationary excess demand while selective policies pursued employment and adjustment.
- supports · pp. 679–681
In 1976, LO adopted a wage-earner-fund proposal based on a Meidner report that advocated collective profit sharing partly to appropriate excess profits associated with solidaristic wage policy.
- supports · p. 692
Erixon's account of the original Rehn–Meidner package presented to the 1951 LO Congress identifies wage policy, labor-market policy, and restrictive macroeconomic policy, not a transfer of productive-asset ownership, as its defining means.
- supports · pp. 677–684
Sweden expanded active labor-market policy from the late 1950s into the early 1970s, during the period Erixon identifies as the Rehn–Meidner model's strongest practical influence.
- supports · pp. 683–684