New Value Within Old Structure: The Creation of Organizational Culture of Nagari in Indonesian Decentralization Era

CLAIM CONNECTIONS / 25

Where this source is used

• Adat can encompass customs, beliefs, norms, and laws; translating it only as ‘customary law’ would narrow the practices examined by the sources.

  • context · p. 106, footnote 1

• Nurdin reports difficulty meeting accounting requirements in Koto Tinggi.

  • supports · p. 110, paragraph beginning ‘Looking at the stipulated mechanism’

• Nurdin presents Koto Tinggi as a Minangkabau nagari in which revived adat institutions interacted with post-decentralization public administration.

  • supports · p. 106, opening paragraph; p. 109, paragraph beginning ‘Structure of Nagari Government’

• The reconvened 2016 meeting reached consensus on allocations for infrastructure, housing repairs, and scholarships.

  • supports · p. 111, second paragraph

• Council members secured a one-week postponement of the 2016 budget meeting.

  • supports · p. 111, first paragraph

• In 2016 the wali nagari delivered a draft budget too late for council review.

  • supports · p. 111, first paragraph

• Nurdin reports incomplete planning documents in Koto Tinggi.

  • supports · p. 110, paragraph beginning ‘Looking at the stipulated mechanism’

• The formal meeting procedure preferred consensus.

  • supports · p. 110, first paragraph, sentence beginning ‘Decision making’

• The Koto Tinggi article does not report participant counts.

  • supports · p. 108, ‘Method’, complete method description

• Under Agam Regulation 12 of 2007, Koto Tinggi’s nagari structure included a Kerapatan Adat Nagari customary council drawn from kin groups.

  • supports · p. 109, third paragraph

• The formal meeting procedure required a two-thirds quorum.

  • supports · p. 110, first paragraph

• Nurdin’s Koto Tinggi study does not separately document descent practice.

  • supports · p. 108, ‘Method’, complete method description

• The Koto Tinggi customary-council head and another adat leader told Nurdin that the representative council displaced the customary council from legislative work.

  • supports · p. 110, final two paragraphs before ‘Dynamic of Interaction in Rural Development’

• Under Agam Regulation 12 of 2007, Koto Tinggi’s nagari structure included an elected wali nagari and executive staff.

  • supports · p. 109, first four paragraphs

• Nurdin reports that the Nagari Council convened development meetings whose invited delegates included representatives of women’s groups.

  • supports · p. 109, ‘The Mechanism of Rural Development’, paragraph beginning ‘According to the Regulation of Ministry of Village’

• Nurdin reports using observation, interviews, a focus group, and document study in Koto Tinggi during October 2016.

  • supports · p. 108, final paragraph before ‘Method’

• Council members told Nurdin that nagari personnel had not been adequately prepared for changing regulations.

  • supports · p. 111, final paragraph

• Under Agam Regulation 12 of 2007, Koto Tinggi’s nagari structure included a representative Nagari Council.

  • supports · p. 109, second paragraph

• Nurdin’s Koto Tinggi study does not separately document postmarital residence.

  • supports · p. 108, ‘Method’, complete method description

• The formal meeting procedure allowed participants to express their views before a decision.

  • supports · p. 110, first paragraph, sentence beginning ‘All participants’

• Nurdin reports unspent program funds in Koto Tinggi.

  • supports · p. 110, paragraph beginning ‘Looking at the stipulated mechanism’

• The formal meeting procedure permitted majority voting if consensus failed.

  • supports · p. 110, first paragraph, final sentence

• The Koto Tinggi article does not identify whose testimony represented women’s experience.

  • supports · p. 108, ‘Method’, complete method description

• Sebastian describes Minangkabau adat, Islamic authority, and state law as interacting rather than isolated domains.

  • supports · p. 109, paragraph beginning ‘Structure of Nagari Government’; p. 110, paragraph beginning ‘Institutionally’

• Nagari is retained for a West Sumatran community and territorial jurisdiction whose customary institutions interact with Indonesian village administration; it is not treated as interchangeable with village in every period.

  • supports · p. 109, paragraph beginning ‘Structure of Nagari Government’