SOURCE / edition
Exercising rights and reconfiguring resistance in the Zapatista Juntas de Buen Gobierno
About this source
The inspected Cambridge University Press manifestation, chapter 4, pp. 163–192, used for located evidence about the bounded Zapatista autonomy case.
CLAIM CONNECTIONS / 4
Where this source is used
Institutional resemblance alone does not justify classifying the bounded Zapatista episode as anarchist.
- supports · chapter 4, pp. 163–192
Speed analyzes the councils as an exercise of Indigenous collective autonomy shaped by local histories and a failed effort to secure state recognition.
- supports · chapter 4, pp. 163–170
This case should be interpreted first through Zapatista and Indigenous self-description rather than used as a test of whether a European political theory works.
- context · chapter 4, pp. 163–170
Independent scholarship describes Zapatista authorities as overlapping state municipalities and primarily governing people who accepted their legitimacy, so the case does not establish exclusive control over a continuous territory.
- supports · chapter 4, pp. 171–183