SOURCE / article

‘What is it actually about?’ Asymmetric mobilisation and the defeat of wage-earner fund policies in Sweden

About this source

The open-access Economic and Industrial Democracy article consulted for the individual-benefit and political-mobilization objection.

CLAIM CONNECTIONS / 4

Where this source is used

  • The 1981 Swedish wage-earner-fund proposal financed the funds through a levy on excess profits.

    • supports · section ‘1978–1981: Muted support, vigorous opposition and the watering down of wage-earner funds’, pp. 514–515
  • Warner reports that objections to capital formation displacing worker power and influence recurred at the 1981 LO and Social Democratic congresses.

    • supports · section ‘1978–1981: Muted support, vigorous opposition and the watering down of wage-earner funds’, pp. 513–514
  • Warner argues that most Social Democratic voters and union members treated wage-earner funds as distant from their everyday concerns.

    • supports · section ‘Theoretical implications: Asymmetries in everyday experience and mobilisation’, pp. 518–519
  • Warner reports recurring complaints that the tangible benefits of wage-earner funds were unclear to intended supporters.

    • supports · section ‘1978–1981: Muted support, vigorous opposition and the watering down of wage-earner funds’, pp. 513–514